Google

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR 2008 TO YOU

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR 2008 TO YOU

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR 2008 TO YOU

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR 2008 TO YOU

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR 2008 TO YOU

FW: HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR 2008 TO YOU

Earning per share (EPS), the key ratio

Earning per share (EPS), is perhaps the most important data from an investor's point of view. It is a definite indication of what the company has earned for the shareholder, post tax. If a shareholder takes the figure, calculates its percentage against the price he paid for the share he knows his rate of return. Comparing this rate with an equivalent rate, say that of government securities, or bank fixed deposit he will get to know whether the company has earned more for him or less.

The logic here is simple. An investor can, and should, consider all net profits of the company to be his, to the extent he owns the equity. If just one owner owned the entire stock, the entire net profit of the company would be his. A partial owner therefore can stake a claim on the profit to the extent of his stock holding.

In security investment, he, the partial owner, does not receive the profits in hand but as we shall see that is to his advantage. He believes that if the company continues to earn a steadily growing EPS and reinvests it, the market will eventually realize the fact and the price of the stock will go up. And that is what he wants! Mary Buffett, who was married to Warren Buffett's son for some time, explains this as the basis of Warren Buffett's investment philosophy, in her book 'Buffettology'.

Let us take a few specific examples for clarity. Bombay Dyeing declared a net profit of Rs. 431.6 Million for the year 1999-2000 against 41 million outstanding shares. This gives an EPS of Rs. 10.53 per share. For an investor who had purchased a Bombay Dyeing share for Rs.50, a year ago, this works out as a return of 21% on his investment. If the investor had invested the same Rs. 50 in a bank deposit at say 10%, he would have earned Rs. 5/-. Obviously he perceives investment in Bombay Dyeing share as a better proposition.

The difference here is that the amount earned by Bombay Dyeing for the investor has not come to him (we shall consider the dividend amount a little later) while that earned in the bank would. Now, if Bombay Dyeing were to give a promise to the investor that it will earn an EPS of Rs.10.52 every year, for next ten years, which translates into a compound rate of return of 21%, the investor may very well choose to maintain his money in the share. Such a certainty will give the Bombay Dyeing share a strong edge over many other investments and though the money does not reach the investor, the market sooner or later takes notice and revalues the share to a higher value, which is what the investor desires.

In the above example if the investor had paid Rs. 100 for the share, his return would have been only about 10%. The price paid by the investor determines the return. Lower the price, higher the return and vice versa.

This is the point where the argument whether a company should pay a dividend or not comes into play. Bombay Dyeing decided to pay Rs. 3 per share as dividend. If there were a reasonable certainty that Bombay Dyeing would earn the same EPS next year our investor is in trouble. He would have to invest those Rs. 3, which the company has given to him to earn a return of 21% minimum. For a small investor this is too heavy a responsibility.

He would rather not take the dividend and request Mr. Nusli Wadia and his management to reinvest his dividend for him in the company and again earn the same EPS. For the investor who paid Rs. 100 per share, the dividend is welcome because he invests that amount in the bank without any sense of loss. Once again it is the price one paid for the share decided the thinking. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway and Microsoft of Bill Gates do not pay any dividend and the shareholders do not mind it. These companies earn more per share income year after year than one would earn elsewhere, of course for the price originally paid for the security. Share prices of all these companies get quoted at high P/E multiples.

People like Warren Buffett, therefore argue that if the company management is capable of retaining and using the shareholders income profitably, to give a consistently high rate of return, it should do so and not pay any dividend, unless the shareholder has an avenue open to him to earn a greater return. If the company is saddled with lots of money, which it does not know how to invest in the current business, it should go out and buy some other profitable business or simply buy back its own shares (consider the example of Bajaj Auto Limited). The assumption here is that a good management knows better how to invest the available funds than a lay investor, which of course is generally true.

Critical element in this thinking is however the certainty factor. Can an investor be certain that the company will earn the same or increasing EPS in future? Therefore the skill of the analyst lies in judging the certainty of return. Further, to take full advantage of the great power of compounding, the investor should be patient enough to wait for long enough time. If the company continues to give a high and increasing rate of return the investor should never sell the stock and allow its price to go up and up. Warren Buffett has followed this philosophy which he learned from Philip Fisher. This also is a point where Buffett deviates from his mentor Benjamin Graham.

To understand the certainty factor let us look at Bombay Dyeing record. Earlier we considered Bombay Dyeing giving an assurance of earning the same EPS for next ten years but a look at the company's record says a different story. The figures are taken from the company's annual report. EPS figures indicate Rs. per share rounded to nearest Re.

Bombay Dyeing

Year

90-91

91-92

92-93

93-94

94-95

95-96

96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

EPS

16

20

16

20

30

31

9

6

5

11


No certainty is evident in the EPS figures. The table shows that the EPS, after oscillating for four years around the mean figure of 18 has suddenly jumped by 50% and then has gone way south in 96-97. This unpredictability may drive away a serious investor and only speculators will be attracted towards the counter. An investor, who purchased the share at Rs. 100 (The high was Rs. 306 and low was Rs. 85 in 96-97) in late 96, thinking that he would get a return of 31%, actually got a return of only 9% and it went further down during the next two years. In these years, however, the company continued to give Rs. 3.50 as dividend and investor could take it and reinvest it at 12-13% and get some higher returns.

There are some companies, which show a growth in EPS every year. Investors love such companies and because of the fickle nature of the market these securities are some times available at throwaway prices. Let us first take a look at HDFC Bank. These figures are taken from the latest annual report. Unlike Bombay Dyeing though these are for last five years only.

HDFC Bank

Year

95-96

96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

EPS

1.04

2.03

3.16

4.12

5.93


The compounded growth rate for the EPS is a staggering 54% without a drop in any of the years. This share was available for Rs. 53 in February 99. Market, among other things, has perhaps noted this growth in earning and has gone after this share which is being quoted around Rs.220/250 currently. Investors feel certain that the growth in EPS will continue. In this particular case merger with another bank viz. Times Bank, probably acted as a catalyst to attract the attention.

Market is definitely fickle because we shall now see a case of growing EPS yet a falling price, that of LIC Housing Finance. In February this year the share was available at about Rs.35/40. Currently it is being traded at about Rs.31/32.

LIC Housing Finance

Year

94-95

95-96

96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

EPS

5.5

6.9

8.4

11.97

13.48

14.54


Here the compounded growth rate in EPS is 21.5%. The share is available today for around Rs.31. If the company continues to give the EPS along the same trend, the EPS in 2000-01 will be Rs. 17.66, which on a purchase price of Rs. 31 works out to about 57%. If an analyst is certain about the company's performance in coming years he may recommend his clients to buy this share. In such a case, according to Buffett, the share looks like a bond with a variable rate of interest. He hopes that sooner or later the market will realize the growth and scale the price upwards. Generally on a long term the market tends to award such shares.

Finally let us take a look at Infosys. We will look at the share from 1992 onwards and we will adjust the EPS for the share split of 1999 but ignore the bonus issues in 95-96 and 98-99. Please also note that in 1994 the market price of the Rs. 10 share was around Rs.600/650.

Infosys

Year

92-93

93-94

94-95

95-96

96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

EPS

12.48

17.76

24.14

18.50

28.90

46.00

37.70

84.30


The compounded annual growth is at 31.4 % and still growing. A sustained growth over such a long period can not go unnoticed. The Rs. 5 share is trading currently at about Rs. 5,500/-

Thus in Buffettology three things become very important. The per share earning and its growth rate, the certainty of the per share earning and the price one pays to buy the share. If all three are favorable the share becomes very attractive. To predict the future growth in EPS, one must understand the business and also the economy. It is not easy and since no one can predict future with certainty some element of uncertainty will persist. Skill lies in reducing that element. Mary Buffett explains that "Without some predictability of future earnings, any calculation of future value is mere speculation and speculation is invitation to folly."

The above discussion will also enlighten the reader about the importance of P/E ratio because the ratio offers a direct relationship between the EPS and the price. A low P/E multiple immediately draws attention to the share. It is an indication that the earning is high but the market has decided to overlook the share for some reason. If an analyst goes deeper and studies the past record, he may discover a trend that tells a tale contrary to what the market is assuming. In that case the share becomes attractive.

Fear and greed drive the security market. A long-term value investor learns to disregard the market sentiment and to depend upon his own judgement. When the fear mentality is pushing the prices down he sees it as an opportunity to jump into the pit and pick up the goodies at low prices. Having picked them he goes to sleep with an assurance that when the market turns greedy it will realize the value of his goodies and reward him. On short-term the market is a voting machine but on long term it is a weighing machine.

 

Current ratio

Current ratio is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. Current assets and liabilities change frequently, unlike long term assets such as land and building or long term liabilities like equity capital or long term loans. The word 'current' denotes that the particular asset or liability is expected to be converted into cash or paid for with cash within twelve months or over the operating cycle, whichever is longer. Thus goods sold on credit, where payment is expected within the period mentioned above, are current assets and material and services purchased on credit in similar manner are current liabilities.

In a manufacturing company the day to day activities of most of the employees affect either the current assets or the current liabilities. Raw material is bought and stocked, finished goods are produced and sold either against cash or on credit, services of all kinds are used, payments are made to suppliers and money is collected from customers. All such activities and many more keep the 'current' assets and liabilities constantly in a flux. Financial managers spend great amount of time managing current assets and current liabilities. Arranging short term financing, negotiating favorable credit terms, controlling the movement of cash, managing inventory etc. consume lot of time and they are all connected with either current assets or current liabilities.

Supposing a moment is frozen in the working of a company and all current liabilities and current assets are calculated, the management, shareholders and also the creditors would be pleased to see current assets exceeding the current liabilities. Such a situation ensures that all day to day creditors can be satisfied without touching the fixed assets of the company. In short, the current ratio indicates the ease with which trade creditors can be satisfied.

Advantages of settling trade credits with ease are many but the most important is the enhancement of credibility. It gives the company the power to negotiate better deals with their supplier, which helps in bringing down the cost. The intangible gain is improved reputation and goodwill. Interestingly, because it is apparent so easily in an annual report, all those who study an annual report take a look at current assets and liabilities at first pass and form an impression.

Who apart, from the management, would be interested in knowing the current ratio? The investors and the Bank credit officers definitely are. Banks seek the data on very regular basis, especially that of sundry debtors and inventory because on that basis they make short term funds available. Investors are interested in finding out the health of the company. To some extent, large suppliers also take a look at the current ratio before agreeing to supply goods.

For an analyst though, the mere computation of the current ratio is not enough, as he also wants to know the composition of current assets and liabilities. Current assets mainly consist of raw material inventory, cash in bank, sundry or trade debtors, and loans and advances made by the company. Current liabilities consist of trade credits, loans and advances taken from customers and others and any other liability of temporary nature and some provisions.

Inventory of raw material, though termed as current asset is really speaking not of much use in settling trade credits. Manufacturing companies rarely carry raw material that can be traded easily in the open market. Raw forgings, castings and other parts, which are specially made for the company are of no use to others. They get converted into cash profitably, only if they are converted into finished goods and sold. Analysts therefore are wary of large inventories, which tend to inflate the current assets and create a false picture. Therefore a ratio called 'Quick ratio' was invented which is a ratio of current assets without inventory, to current liabilities. Thinking here is clear. Creditors wish their credits to be settled in cash and not in kind and therefore assets which are in the form of cash or those which can be easily converted into cash are worth their salt. Raw material inventory can not be readily converted into cash and therefore is to be ignored.

From such a point of view, cash in bank and those cash investments that can be easily liquidated are most welcome.

Sundry debtors form major part of current assets but they are not very liquid. As a farmer would put it, it is grain in the field and not in the silo. These are with the customers to whom goods have been sold on credit and as the saying goes there is many a slip between the cup and the lip. Large sundry debts will improve the current ratio but hidden behind the size could be the fact that debts are not being collected efficiently. Activity of collecting debts frequently causes friction between sales and finance people. A very high ratio could indicate that suppliers are weary of granting credits and company is forced to settle them in cash while the customers are enjoying long credit periods. It could also mean that a company would be facing a cash crunch sooner or later.

So then, what is a good value of current ratio? It changes from industry to industry and also from company to company within a sector. One thing is certain, a ratio of less than one is not desirable, for obvious reasons. As a very general rule and at a superficial level, a ratio of two is satisfactory. Ratio of less than two should invite investigation.

It would be worth our while to see some actual figures from published reports. Four companies are chosen and their figures are presented below in a table. All are leading companies in their field. The companies are Bajaj Auto Ltd., Cummins India Ltd., Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. and LIC Housing Finance Ltd. All figures are in Rs. Million. Accounting year is also mentioned for the sake of correctness.

Company

Acct. Yr.

C/Assets

C/Liablities

C/Ratio

Inventory

Q/Ratio

Bajaj Auto

99-2000

23,730.80

17,403.74

1.36

 2,611.26

1.21

Cummins

98-99

3,546.18

1,113.44

3.18

 1,176.61

2.13

GESCO

98-99

5,750.45

2,527.74

2.27

 1,085.83

1.84

LIC Hsg

99-2000

3,960.65

2,043.50

1.94

 Nil

 1.94

Figures in Rs million


At first glance Cummins and GESCO show a current ratio higher than 2, while the other two show it below 2. The quick ratio shows that with BAL the fall is very little (about 11%) and with LHF there is no change as there is no inventory. LHF has a note in its annual report, which explains that all stock purchases are treated as expenditure for the year without making any provision for stock at the end of the year. The stock mainly consists of stationary and forms etc.

With a current ratio lower than the norm, are these two companies under any stress to settle their creditors? Though such an analysis is out of the scope of this article, in passing we will mention that further analysis of BAL is necessary. With LIC Housing finance a glance at the current assets tells that the assets cover the liabilities sufficiently.

What about the other two companies? They are showing a very healthy current as well as quick ratio, yet I recommend going deeper. Composition of debtors is always worth studying. GESCO informs that out of Rs. 1,465 Million of sundry debts Rs. 371.3 Million, about 25%, are of over six months and, considered good. An analyst may want to make a provision for these debts or at least a part and reduce the current assets accordingly. Sundry debts have a habit of degenerating into bad debts very fast and the effort spent in recovering such bad debts reduces their value. Moreover companies don't like to accept that debts are 'bad' and continue spending money to recover them. If all sundry debts 'over six months but considered good' are removed then the current assets stand reduced to Rs. 5379.15 Million and the current ratio gets reduced to 2.13.

Difference between current assets and liabilities is termed as working capital. Imagine a hypothetical situation where all current assets consist of sundry debts and all current liabilities consist of sundry credits. If the debt is recovered in full the credits can also be settled in full and the money left over will be available for day to day spending. In real life the matters are more complex. If the difference between assets and liabilities is made available in advance, daily affairs of the company can go on unhindered and as the debts are recovered, the money can be used to settle credits as well as repayment. This is how banks tend to view the situation. Such a view also gives rise to some bad practices. Some companies tend to raise false invoices to 'create' sundry assets in order to overcome temporary cash crunch. Shareholders can rest easy with large well-audited companies but even then studying the current assets and liabilities in detail helps.

Many years ago I met a businessman, from a community known for its business acumen, who told me that he did not believe in sundry debtors? He sold goods on cash and purchased raw material on credit. So his current assets showed zero sundry debtors but plenty of cash sitting in bank and drawing interest. Many cash rich companies have similar situation. For the accountant of the company this is real Nirvana.

 

A costly game

There is a very costly game that a large number of people are indulging in these days. The game involves trading in shares of companies. This popular sport has logged in an aggregate turnover (Bombay Stock Exchange + National Stock Exchange) of Rs10,70,000cr during the period April-September.

The ten most popular stocks that game participants are trading in include worthies such as Himachal Futuristic, Satyam Computer and Zee Telefilms. Together these three hog as much as 75% of the stock market's version of television rating points (TRPs).

 

HFCL steals the thunder

However, the stock that steals the thunder with 15 TRPs is the 'born again' telecom-cum-software-cum-entertainment company, HFCL. This all-rolled-in-one ICE heavyweight has recorded a trading volume of Rs148,209cr during the April-September period this year.

 

Game participants love it

At today's closing price the market capitalisation of the company is Rs12,000cr. This makes HFCL among the 10 most valuable companies in the country. Maybe a place in the Sensex beckons! Game participants (investors, traders and what have you!) eager to own a share of this ICE heavyweight have turned the company over a dozen times in the past six months (that is Rs148,209cr worth of HFCL shares have changed hands during the period as against a market capitalisation of Rs12,000cr)



But they don't want a long term relationship

HFCL is expected to report a profit in the region of over Rs250cr this year, a growth of over 150% year on year. In the ICE age it is only understandable that every market participant worth his salt wants to own a two-bit share of this company. However, data indicate nobody really wants to own this company for too long. HFCL has been bought and sold lock, stock and barrel a dozen times over. Wonder why nobody wants to hold on to this ICE maiden for very long!

So, how much does a player pay to take part in this hugely popular game where the prize appears to be not a long lasting relationship with great stocks but a one-night stand?

 

Well, any game involves some costs

In this case, it is the brokerage that the game participants incur while buying and selling shares of a company. Let's assume that the participants in this game pay a brokerage of 0.1% every time they trade (and that is a pretty realistic estimate of brokerage rates prevailing in the country!). That throws up a figure of Rs148cr!



It takes two to tango

Now remember that in this game there has to be a seller and a buyer. It takes two to tango after all. Hence, the total fees paid by buyers and sellers in this game amounts to Rs296cr. And this is the cost of the game for six months. If this blockbuster continues to play all over gaming rooms in the country for another six months the game participants would have shelled out a rich sum of Rs600cr!

All of this in an effort to take control of a company that will generate a net profit of just Rs250cr this year! Do they know something we don't or have they forgotten to do the arithmetic?

 

Kissa Market Ka...

You have got richer with the knowledge that owning a share means owning a part of a company. You are aware now that investing in equities helps preserve and enhance the process of wealth generation. You have also learnt that investing in equities is not all only about quick and easy money. ‘Khel Risky Hai’. We then discussed how it was possible to make the ‘Khel’ becomes less risky for you. We discussed how to tame that monster called Risk. You’ve learnt about the basic tools in an analyst’s armoury—PE, RONW, ROCE, Enterprise Value…

Welcome to the World of the Informed Investor. You are now armed with the knowledge of why equities are important and how to value them. It’s time we went into overdrive. You are now aware of how to value a stock, but while it all seemed like an intelligent science so far, very often the stock market seems like a mad place.

Is the stock market like the vegetable market?

Well, the answer is NO. In a vegetable market, there are several links in the chain. The farmer, who grows the vegetables, is the primary seller. But he cannot reach us, the primary consumers, directly. Between the farmer and us are several middlemen, each one with his own cut. The farmer has no idea of the price the consumers (that’s us) are willing to pay and we have no idea of the price at which the producer is willing to sell.

What about the market for soaps? Is it any different? To an extent, yes. HLL produces ‘Lifebuoy’. But before the product reaches you, it passes through the vast network of wholesalers, dealers, stockists, and retailers. Each one pays a different price before passing it down the chain. However, in this case the producer does set a final price that you would pay. But you do not have the option to bypass the chain.

Stockmarket operates at the speed of light

The stock market is different. Everybody, starting from YOU to the research analyst, the company insider, the mutual fund, the FII and the trader/operator, participates in the same market . Small wonder that the market works at the speed of light. In the vegetable market, due to the presence of several intermediaries, price responds with a lag to information and events. For instance, if there is a sudden spurt in the demand for apples, prices will not shoot up immediately. The information will travel back to the farmer and if there is a shortage, prices will eventually spiral. In the stock market, price discovery is instantaneous. Information and events are known immediately given that all market participants congregate at one place or on one seamless network.

The stock exchange

The stock exchange is where all participants converge to determine the price of the product, that is, shares. Ownership of a share indicates ownership of a certain proportion in a company. Imagine a world without shares—it would be virtually impossible to create a business and then be able to realise value for it. Shares enable you to separate ownership from management and allow businesses to be traded in pieces without forcing the company/business itself to be broken down. To the outside observer and even to market participants, the stock market often seems to be a place where no logic works and only madness prevails. But as you continue along this voyage into the world of equities, we hope to convince you otherwise.

Only fundamentals work in the long term

At the end of the day, it is the fundamentals which determine the prices. Every investor must understand that the fundamental factors which market prices reflect are the sum total of perceptions of all the investors. A seminal work in this context is the “Rational expectations theory”. Shares prices discount the future, and only the variability of the outcome drives prices. 

For instance, the market expects Tisco to announce a profit of Rs100cr. If the profit turns out to be Rs110cr, the market will react positively, driving up the stock price. The opposite would happen if the profit is Rs90cr. Nobody in this world knows what would happen tomorrow and, therefore, markets are perfect only to the extent of available facts and information. Markets can never be perfect with regard to their expectations of the future.

Many times, company insiders would have information about a particular event and their activity may make the stock price move towards a level it would have attained if the event was known in the market. This again is not knowledge of the future but knowledge of an event that has already happened. 

However, this information is restricted to only a few people and, from that point of view, it is a past event for the insiders and a future event for others (investors please note that insider trading is a culpable offence in India and other countries). Investors active in the stock market have to look at market-sensitive factors. It can significantly enhance your returns on investment if you carefully play these factors.

Isn’t it all just about money power?

The rules of demand and supply apply to the stock market just like in any other market. At the end of the day, the price of a stock moves up only if the demand from buyers is more than the supply. Therefore, in the short term market participants with huge money power can significantly impact the demand-supply equation and hence prices. Who are the market participants? Literally everybody—the institutions (FIIs, FIs, Mutual Funds, Banks, Corporates), retail investors (You and Me) and speculators & traders. So sure, sometimes it does appear that it is just those few mega speculators or FIIs who are the only ones driving prices. But the market is bigger than just one or 2 of the big boys. Consider: between September 1994 and October 1998 the supposedly big money FIIs pumped in US$6.1bn into the market, but it went nowhere. The reason: without fundamentals, the money power is worth nothing. And while your 100 shares of Cadbury might seem like nothing, think of millions of investors like yourself, all over the country, and that is quite some firepower.

What contributes to the mood swings

Each of them has a different risk profile, return expectation and time horizon for their investments. Very often, each of them also has different levels of information. So the investor who happens to be a shopkeeper may know ahead of most others that Cadbury’s new ‘Perk’ variant is taking the pants off the competition.The fact that the stock market is a congregation of people with such different characteristics often results in wild mood swings. There is the retail investor who might be selling because he wants to raise money for his son’s marriage (these days that happens too, you know). But there is also the retail investor who is squirreling away his savings for the day when he retires and might not have a regular source of income. There is the FII who is buying because Asia is suddenly the hottest market in the world. And there could also be the FI who is buying to support the market under government instructions. Add to it the speculator who has a very short-term horizon—he knows that Badla rates this weekend are going to be high and therefore the market could head lower by the closing today. So, at any given moment, the market trend depends on which of the participants are in control.

Ignore the noise factor
What about events that receive a lot of attention—budgets, political uncertainty, duty hikes etc? Sure, they have an impact on the market. But what is their real impact on good businesses (read good companies)? At most times, it is too negligible to actually impact the long-term potential of a good business. But almost always, share prices will be super-sensitive to such factors. So learn to accept that the market is going to have its moods; but at the same time, learn to ignore them.

What makes this market unique
What makes the stock market so unique is that no matter who is selling or buying, there is always a person on the other side. In other words, when somebody is buying, at the same time somebody else is selling. That is logical, isn’t it? If everybody only always wanted to sell or only wanted to buy, then no trading would take place. Of course, trading does stop sometimes when artificial means like “circuit filters” are forced by the exchange. It is the liquidity of this market and the two-way exchange process that makes it unique. Can you take the vegetables back to the market and sell them? Well, in this market you can do the equivalent.

We hope this has helped you to understand better the dynamics of the marketplace—who are the participants and how prices are determined

 

Speculation ain't a four-letter word

Last time, we had mentioned that what makes the stock market unique is that no matter who is selling or buying, there is always a person on the other side. It is the much-maligned traders/speculators who impart this liquidity to the stock market. This week, we delve deeper into the role of a speculator/operator.

 

“The stock market is a dangerous place because of the existence of traders and speculators.” My mother used to tell me that the stock market is not the place for anybody’s hard earned savings. But after having invested in some good mutual funds a year back and seeing the returns, she now has a vastly improved opinion of the market.
But, mention trading and speculation and the thaw is instantly replaced by a chill. Images of the Big Bull, Nick Leeson, CRB, etc, etc, begin to loom large in her mind. Images of untold misery of thousands of small investors, caused by the actions of these speculators.
So, is all trading and speculation bad?
Or is mom missing the wood for the trees?

The truth is that in the stock market, everybody has a role to play, whether it be the small investor, the mutual fund, the FII or the much maligned operator/speculator.

Why speculators? Let us presume for a moment that the market is devoid of any traders and speculators. Then the market would be devoid of liquidity. In other words, it would be difficult to buy or sell stocks without significantly affecting the prices. Enter the speculator. He is willing to take more risks than your average investor; he is willing to buy stocks with a very short-time horizon—days, even hours perhaps. The speculator knows that daily price moves are as much a function of the daily sentiment as they are a function of the fundamentals of a company. And he looks to profit from them.

To understand this better, let’s peek into a typical day in the life of a speculator.
Bajaj Auto workers have gone on a strike and the price has fallen 8%. I bought Bajaj Auto just a week earlier and am starting to feel pretty sick. But the speculator…he begins to scent an opportunity.

Next morning: I’m heading for the exit…
The next day, the newspaper headlines scream out that Bajaj Auto’s EPS could fall 3% if this strike lasts more than 10 days. I can really feel a chill going down my spine. Oh my God! If this stock falls any further I would be sitting on a loss, I tell myself. But hey, I am a smart guy. So I’ll sell the stock today and wait for it to fall another 10-15% and then buy it back.

…while the speculator is moving in for the kill
Things are going according to plan. I place my order to sell at 10:00 a.m. sharp. The stock opens down 2%, but my broker has an order to sell at the market price and he promptly does so. Guess many other brokers had similar orders as well and soon the stock crumbles a further 8%. Now the speculator moves in for the kill. Fine, Bajaj Auto’s profits may drop 3% if this strike persists for more than 10 days. But the stock is down nearly 16% since the news came out. That may be justified if this strike last longer than 10 days. However, he feels the market has overreacted and starts to buy gradually at the lower circuit (the lowest price that the exchange permits the stock to fall on a day). In the process, he absorbs the selling pressure coming from some other friends of mine who called me in the morning and decided that my strategy was very wise indeed.

1.30 p.m.: The foreigner steps in…
It’s now 1:30 p.m. in Bombay; the stock is down only 7% and only some stray trades are taking place. A large foreign fund in London, which has been looking to buy Bajaj Auto for the last 6 months, senses an opportunity. This fund manager has a 5-year horizon when he buys a stock. As far as he is concerned, even if the strike were to persist for a month, the impact on the earnings of the company would be only a blip over the 5-year horizon he has in mind. He places his orders for a very, very large quantity of Bajaj.

…and the speculator’s eagle eye detects his presence
As his broker in Bombay starts buying, you can see some stirrings of life in the stock. It’s now up 2% from its low. Some more friends of mine think this is a heaven sent opportunity. When they had earlier reached me for advice, there were no buyers in the stock. Now there are buyers 2% above that price. Hallelujah! Promptly, they decide to follow me and place their sell orders too. Our speculator is watching the screen and he now senses that perhaps some other buyer in the stock has emerged. He offers a large-sized block on the screen (only a small portion of his total purchase, though). Immediately, somebody grabs it up. Now he is convinced that there is a buyer. He promptly buys back the small quantity he sold and then a little more. He senses the entry of a bigger fish.

Sometime later: more buyers in the ring
Shah and Sons is a venerable BSE broking house and has always been positive on Bajaj Auto ever since the stock traded in its late teens. It has a lot of clients who bought Bajaj Auto when it was in the late teens. Having become millionaires thanks to their investment in the stock, they have complete trust and faith in the ability of the company to make it through this strike. Shah & Sons recommends the stock yet again to its clients, who start to buy...

It’s 3.00 p.m.: the stock’s recovered…
The foreign fund is an unrelenting buyer and by 3:00 PM the stock is down only 1%, nearly 7% above its low for the day—which was when our speculator friend bought his stock.

…and ‘short-sellers’ are scurrying for ‘cover’
Enter the short-sellers. They are the guys who sell stocks they don’t have because they think the stock is going to fall. And when it does, they will buy the stock back (the jargon is “covering”). Some of them had sold the stock yesterday because they expected it to fall further. They were right. It did. Some have covered and booked their profits. But some have not. And now they want to do so too—might as well take home the meagre profit we are still making, they say to themselves. Some of my friends not only sold their existing holdings of Bajaj Auto but also went short (i.e., sold stock they did not possess) as they were very confident that the stock would drop further. As their brokers called them with the bad news that the stock had gained since they had short sold, they panicked and asked their brokers to buy back the stock they had sold short. For them, it is now only a question of reducing their losses on the short trade.

It’s closing time—and party time for the speculator
Now the action is really heating up. With just 15 minutes to go, the stock is now trading 1% above yesterday. Our speculator friend had made 9% in just a day. Meanwhile, some funds which have been sitting on the fence wondering when to make their purchases start feeling left out. They come rushing in to buy. Our speculator friend decides to cash in his chips. As these new funds and the shortsellers come charging in to buy, he starts to sell. For the next 15 minutes, the stock is extremely volatile, rising nearly 4% above yesterday’s close…the speculator sells all his stock.

Post script: not every day’s as good
It’s not always a happy ending like this for the speculator. Sometimes, he can be spotted drinking away his sorrows late into the night at Mahesh Lunch Home, in the vicinity of the BSE. But today he had a good day (calls for nothing but Geoffreys). He took a contrarian view (we would call it a common sense view) and profited from it. He provided an exit route for distressed sellers like me and provided supply to the few funds who came late to the party. In the process, he made a neat profit. But as I said earlier, sometimes he makes a loss as well.

So that then is the role of a speculator—he provides liquidity by buying when (nearly) everybody else wants to sell, and by selling when the opposite happens. In the process, he matches time horizons as well—my limited time horizon which made me decide to sell with the idea of buying back later, with that of our London-based FII who decided to buy with a 5-year view. He provided the liquidity. He did it because he knows that all the players in the market have different time horizons and expectations. He just helps bridge the gap.

After this, I hope you will all have something good to say about the speculator. Mom does!

(All characters and events in this write-up are fictitious. Any resemblance to real-life characters and/or events is purely coincidental.)

 

Google